<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bye Bye Browser?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ojomobile.wordpress.com/2007/04/11/openwaves-bye-bye-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ojomobile.wordpress.com/2007/04/11/openwaves-bye-bye-browser/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Rants, &#38; Raves on Wireless</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bennett Marks</title>
		<link>http://ojomobile.wordpress.com/2007/04/11/openwaves-bye-bye-browser/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennett Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 01:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojomobile.wordpress.com/2007/04/11/openwaves-bye-bye-browser/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hey Ted,

You still seem to have an emotional stake in the mobile browser market. I can understand why. Here at Nokia, we&#039;ve decided to drive away from the so-called &quot;mobile browser&quot;, and have concentrated on &quot;full web&quot;. While that still leaves us with a small-screen conundrum, it makes the choice of browsing tech easy. That&#039;s why we chose Webkit, cause in the end, its going to be a compatibility game, not a feature game. The browser that correctly handles the most sites, with the &quot;least painful&quot; user experience, wins.

Hope to see you back in the fray,

    -Bennett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ted,</p>
<p>You still seem to have an emotional stake in the mobile browser market. I can understand why. Here at Nokia, we&#8217;ve decided to drive away from the so-called &#8220;mobile browser&#8221;, and have concentrated on &#8220;full web&#8221;. While that still leaves us with a small-screen conundrum, it makes the choice of browsing tech easy. That&#8217;s why we chose Webkit, cause in the end, its going to be a compatibility game, not a feature game. The browser that correctly handles the most sites, with the &#8220;least painful&#8221; user experience, wins.</p>
<p>Hope to see you back in the fray,</p>
<p>    -Bennett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chetan</title>
		<link>http://ojomobile.wordpress.com/2007/04/11/openwaves-bye-bye-browser/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>chetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojomobile.wordpress.com/2007/04/11/openwaves-bye-bye-browser/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hi Ted,

Thanks for your note. IMHO, Openwave&#039;s current moves are catch-up. Being the pioneer in the space, it didn&#039;t adjust to the changing market quickly enough and let other browser and UI companies take away the mkt share. Result is - company is trying to reinvent itself every few months, changing the CEO, most of the original talent has let and it is looking sell the company.

my 2c.

Cheers,
Cheatn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ted,</p>
<p>Thanks for your note. IMHO, Openwave&#8217;s current moves are catch-up. Being the pioneer in the space, it didn&#8217;t adjust to the changing market quickly enough and let other browser and UI companies take away the mkt share. Result is &#8211; company is trying to reinvent itself every few months, changing the CEO, most of the original talent has let and it is looking sell the company.</p>
<p>my 2c.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Cheatn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
